An Overview On Food Safety Management System Commerce Essay

An Overview On f are base hit Management System Commerce EssayIn this chapter, several axes concerning the tincture and the gumshoe of nutrient will be discussed. It is important to clarify these axes if unity should research this field. To start, clarifying what is the commentary of provender rubber eraser is a must(prenominal)(prenominal) and what is meant by diet natural rubber, according to its importance, and what are the represents of the development of forage asylum concept finishedout the fare drawing string. Likewise, shifting to the concept of ISO 22000, the date of issue, the urgent command that derived its issue and what it includes from the requirements of solid viands for thought for thought refuge is a must, also alone everyplacesight brasss and the fundamentals that the transcription is establish upon. Due to the talk in this chapter roundive solid nutrition precaution, ignoring the main foundation of aliment preventive agreement which is HACCP and its long suit as running body to gift the rubber of nutrient burn non be done. Talking about the ISO 9000 dust also will be done, and wherefore m each institutions utilize both HACCP and ISO 9000, and why the HACPP constitution did non hold on by its suffer keeping the none of the intellectual nourishment true(p)ty precaution trunk. Demonstrating the urgent get hold of that lead institutions concerned with keeping fare rubber systems to the necessity of running a system such as the ISO 22000 system instead of the HACCP system alone also will be done. The characteristics of applying the ISO 22000 system over the HACCP system alone will be adjoind. The characteristic aim of applying this system in the development and advancement of the institutions functional with this system shall be demonstrated. In addition to the necessity of discussing the benefits of applying the ISO 22000 on the institutions running on this system as soundly as the fields of its finishs starting from the farm cashbox the serving dish including all the run such as transportation, circulate and giveing the institutions with pabulum that is to be processed, as well as the contrary transportation process of this food doneout the whole stages of circulating and manufacturing.thusly what is said earlier stinkpot be summarized and clarified by talking about the by-line axes1- Definitions of fodder guard duty2- ISO 22000 Concepts3- HACCP and ISO 90004- HACCP versus ISO 220005- ISO 22000 Advantages6- ISO 22000 applications3.2 Definitions of nourishment Safety aliment condom is about the prevention, elimination, or fake of food borne possibilitys at the menses of consumption. Everyday around the world, people agree on this one point-consumers take in and deserve assurance that the food sold for them is safe to consume. As the food safety encounters whitethorn be introduced at any stage of the food cede chain, every follow in the planning chain must exercise adequate hazard jibes. In fact, food safety fuckingnister be only battend by the combined efforts of all mappingies in the food chain.Organizations inwardly the food supply chain range from primary procedures (e.g farmers, ranchers) through food processor, storage and transportation performers, subcontracts, and all the way to retail outlets (e.g., groceries, restaurants), as well as every point and company in amid. And through their harvest-homes are not move of the food we consume, bookrs of processing equipment, packaging materials, cleanup agents, additives/ingredients, and even supporter provider (e.g., equipments testers) are also integral parts of the supply chain of food safety.Otherwise what do we mean by nutrition safety as a concept? Safety is an compound concept, which comprises both whole tone factors, namely the intent to which it meets the needs of the people, and safety factors, the extent to which it may do harm to p eoples health. Therefore, food Safety is a complex system engineering, which involves raw materials, activities of take and harvest-tide test.(Zhu, et al., 2008), Food safety remains huge opportunity for service in preventing distemper from known food pathogens and in responding to new and emerging food borne illnesses and thr feed ins (The ASQ the quarterly Quality Report June 2007)(not mentioned in references). A similar description of food safety as protection of food against chemical, biological and physical factors which can endanger human health has been mathematical functiond by (leaf-book, 2003). Food safety as a concept means that foodstuffs should not be nocent to the consumer and recognizes that food safety hazards can be introduced at any stage of the food chain (GFSI Technical Committee September 2007). The World health Organization (WHO, 2003) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) define food safety as food that is free from all hazards, whether chronic or acute, that may make food injurious to the health of the consumer. Food safety relates to the conditions and practices that conduct the property of food and prevent contamination and food borne illnesses. Also we can conclude that food safety is link up to how safe the food we eat is. Its mandate covers the transportation, manufacturing and processing, consumer safety, production of equipment for food safety, storage, delivery exportation and importation.(WHO,2003) define food safety as all conditions and peaks that are necessary during the production, processing, storage, distribution, and preparation of food to procure that it is safe, sound, wholesome and fit for human consumption.3.3 ISO 22000 ConceptsThe process started in November 2001 with voting on the final exam draft in August 2005. each 34 subject area monetary quantity bodies that voted were positive and there were no rejections. The standard was create in September 2005 and subsequently translated for univ erseation by national standard bodies, which are replacing national standards by ISO 22000. It has also been published as an European (CEN) standard EN-ISO 22000 and is currently the standard in over 40 countries.ISO 220002005 provides a example of transnationally harmonized requirements for the international apostrophize that is needed. The standard has been developed inwardly ISO by secures from the food industry, along with representatives of narrow down international disposals and in close cooperation with the Codex Alimentarius Commission, the body jointly complete by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World wellness Organization (WHO) to develop food standards (ISO 22000 for safe food supply chains.ISO 220002005, Food safety instruction systems Requirements for any judicature in the food chain, aims to encounter that there are no ill-defined links in the food supply chain. Since its publication in September 2005, the standard has been well accredited by the food industry and is clearly becoming a worldwide standard to be reckoned with. ISO 22000 has been knowing with flexibility to enable a tailor-make approach to food safety for all segments of the food chain. It does not come a one size fits all approach since the standards and procedures mandatory for utmost risk areas in one food sector may not be leave in an former(a). For this reason, unlike other schemes, the standard does not provide a checklist methodology.In 2005 ISO 22000 was published to be the first international food safety perplexity standard applicable to the whole food supply chain. The aim was to understand all parts of a supply chain, no matter their location or function, could be united down the stairs one standard. ISO 22000 requires an organization to demonstrate its ability to manage food safety hazards and provide consistently safe products that meet both customer requirements and food safety regulations. It was hailed as the ult imate opportunity to harmonies global food safety approaches.ISO 22000 standard is considered to be the first international whole tone standard designed to work with all cultural prescription, statutes and regulation.ISO 22000 is dedicated to improve consumer confidence in the food product and the process. It applies to every link in the food supply chain from the farm to the table.(Joee Carroll, 2008) . ISO 22000 is an international, auditable standard that specifies the requirement of food safety care by incorporating all the pieces of penny-pinching Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Hazard abbreviation hyper deprecative underwrite Points (HACCP) together with a comprehensive heed system. (Vel, et al., 2005)Food safety commission system (FSMS) combining between Good Management Practices, Hazard Analysis and Critical suss out Point (HACCP) principles and sound supplier verification and validation, ensuring that all actions possible are taken, recorded and verified to e nsure safe food, which is based on the HACCP principles. This requires a company policy definition and fiber manual, with definition of responsibilities for management and employees, prerequisite programs and HACCP broadcast implementation, and preparing pre-request programs and measures for implementing the food safety program. Preparing the HACCP team and useful recording systems, and a combination of self assessment with application of innate auditing, management review, application of all legal requirements and supplier evaluation, are other concerns in this system. (Mehrdad, 2007).So food safety management systems principally realise the unique(predicate) food safety hazards associated with the product and ensure compliance with food safety legislation.(L. Manning , R.N. Baines,2004). In line with all other standardized management systems, the general approach adopted by the ISO 22000 standard is based on the application of process management principles. A number of manag ement philosophies, such as TQM and Six Sigma, are also based on these principles (Hammer, 2002). Core element of process management is the concept of processes. In this context, the management system of an organization can be viewed as a single large process, which may be broken down to several sub-processes (Bhuiyan and Alam, 2005). Effective management of these processes ensures impressive management of the whole organization (see Armistead et al., 1999). It should be noted that in the content of ISO 22000, as mentioned in ISO/TS 22004 (giving guidelines for applying the standard), processes are considered in terms of food safety (IOS, 2005b).A discover tool for effective process management is the well known Deming cyclePlan-Do-Check- Act (PDCA). Plan concerns the design of processes, in a way that fully specifies which activities are to be done (when, by whom and how) so as to ensure repeatability and consistency. Do cover the implementation of these activities, in pact wit h the design. Measurements of end-to-end process performance and assessment of these measurements in post to ease targets setting are actually part of Check. Finally, Act refers to process improvement and ensures that the critical activities are executed in the most efficient and effective manner. Processes standardization is also an important issue (see Davenport, 2005). In tack together to apply the PDCA cycle, ISO 22000 has adapted a requirements presentation scheme immediately analogous to the ISO 90012000 quality systems standard. Specifically, after three initial articles (giving scope, references and definitions) the ISO22000 requirements are grouped into five articles(1) Food safety management system(2) Management responsibility(3) Resource management(4) Planning and realization of safe products and(5) Validation, verification and improvement.Under the first clause, the organization establishes and documents a food safety management system and defines its scope (i.e. pr oducts, processes and sites). The management responsibility clause specifies requirements covering safety policy definition, safety cookery (through objectives and targets), converse issues and management review. Provision of all resources necessary for the implementation of the system is the scope of the resource management clause. In the planning and realization of safe products clause, all production processes affecting products safety need be designed and the single safety plans developed. In fact, this clause includes most technical requirements of unblemished HACCP (and is the only clause drastically different from its ISO 9001 counterpart). Finally, the last clause specifies requirements which ensure system verification (i.e. the system ability to reliably deliver anticipate safety gists) and continuous improvement.(Panagiotis, 2009)This International example specifies the requirements for a food safety management system that combines the following generally recognized key elements to ensure food safety along the food chain, up to the point of final consumption Interactive dialogue. System management. Prerequisite programmes. HACCP principles.Communication along the food chain is essential to ensure that all relevant food safety hazards are identified and adequately bindled at each yard within the food chain. This implies communication between organizations both upstream and downstream in the food chain. Communication with customers and suppliers about identified hazards and take hold measures will help oneself in clarifying customer and supplier requirements (e.g. with regard to the feasibility and need for these requirements and their impact on the end product).Recognition of the organizations role and position within the food chain is essential to ensure effective interactive communication throughout the chain in order to deliver safe food products to the final consumer. An example of the communication channels among interested parties of the food chain is shown in Figure (2-1).Figure (2-1) Example of communication within the food chain,(ISO 22000 International measurement, 2005)The most effective food safety systems are established, operated and updated within the framework of a structured management system and incorporated into the general management activities of the organization.This provides maximum benefit for the organization and interested parties. This International Standard has been aligned with ISO 9001 in order to enhance the compatibility of the two standards This International Standard can be applied independently of other management system standards. Its implementation can be aligned or integrated with alive related management system requirements, spot organizations may utilize active management system(s) to establish a food safety management system that complies with the requirements of this International Standard.This International Standard integrates the principles of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system and application paces developed by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. By means of auditable requirements, it combines the HACCP plan with prerequisite programs (PRPs). Hazard depth psychology is the key to an effective food safety management system, since conducting a hazard analysis assists in organizing the knowledge required to establish an effective combination of go measures. This International Standard requires that all hazards that may be reasonably judge to occur in the food chain, including hazards that may be associated with the part of process and facilities used, are identified and assessed. Thus it provides the means to determine and document why certain identified hazards need to be tallyled by a grouchy organization and why others need not. During hazard analysis, the organization determines the schema to be used to ensure hazard bind by combining the PRP(s), useable PRP(s) and the HACCP plan.This International Standard a llows an organization (such as a small and/or less developed organization) to implement an externally developed combination of go over measures.The aim of this International Standard is to harmonize on a global level the requirements for food safety management for businesses within the food chain. It is particularly intended for application by organizations that seek a more focused, crystalline and integrated food safety management system.3.4 HACCP and ISO 9000The ISO 9000 quality management systems standards father become a major element of supplier management strategy for many multinational corporations (Birkenstock, 1999 Wasik, 1994a). Manufacturers implement the ISO 9000 standards with the intention of reaping the benefits, while customers perceive ISO 9000-registered plants as being more capable of delivering products of consistent quality (Adams, 1994 Pallett, 1994 Mehta and Wilcock, 1996). Both manufacturers and customers gather in indicated that companies using quality systems such as the ISO 9000 standards assimilate several advantages over competitors that have not implemented such systems. These advantages include improved product quality and reliability, amplificationd customer satisfaction, get downd scrap and rework, increased manufacturing efficiency, crack delivery clock times, rapid systematic response to change, and increased interdepartmental communication leading to increased teamwork (Adams, 1994 Bennet and Steed, 1999 Eyles, 1995 Newslow, 1997).ISO 9000 refers to a group of standards containing clauses consumeed at the quality management process of an organization. The standards define a quality framework within which a registered company must operate as a minimum criterion for a quality management system (Stringer, 1994 Surak and Simpson, 1994). To ensure their ongoing relevance, they are reviewed regularly, with the most recent revision having been published in December 2000. Attaining ISO 9000 registration does not equate wi th achieving a world year quality system since the ISO standards describe only the minimum criteria for a quality management system (Surak, 1999). HACCP/ISO transitions.The ISO 9000 standards are generic and can be applied to any industry. Their purpose is to establish the existence of a documented quality system. ISO 9000 standards do not describe how a company should manage its quality system, but focus on whether a company is complying with its own compose policies and procedures. Both HACCP and ISO 9000 systems are management philosophies that rely on disciplined operator control and teamwork (Wasik, 1994b). Both focus on prevention rather than retrospective inspection. However, the major difference between the two systems is the scope. HACCP is process and product oriented. HACCP is altogether focused on food safety therefore quality factors should not be part of a HACCP program (Newslow, 1997).In contrast, ISO 9000 is more systems-oriented and designed to manage quality (Na tional Food Processors Association, 1992). ISO 9000 certification does not certify the product but merely provides confidence that a suppliers quality system is capable of providing a stated product or service (Bennet and Steed, 1999). HACCP puts control mechanisms in place to ensure that the product is safe and make to standards that are formulated internationally, whereas ISO 9000 requires that an organization define its own system and demonstrate that it can comply with it (Mayes, 1993).HACCP and ISO focus on prevention. HACCP assures food safety by controlling the process. ISO 9000 ensures system conformance to the standards. These two programs have complimentary systems that honor and strengthen an organizations overall quality system (Newslow, 1997). To be maximally effective, these plans must be tailored to the manufacturing facility, requiring management leadership and commitment, expert knowledge in program development, employee training and operator control (National Foo d Processors Association, 1992).3.5 HACCP versus ISO 22000Food quality and food safety are immersing critical issues at the international level since outbreaks of food borne illness can damage hatful and tourism, and lead to loss of earnings, unemployment and litigation. Food spoilage is wasteful, costly and can adversely affect trade and consumer confidence. To cope this issue, HACCP (Hazard analysis critical control points) in which was firstly established in the USA 3 decades ago as the preventive mechanism for safety control of foods has been worldwide adopted into the production and service food industries.( Prasert, 2007).Historically, based on end product scrutiny strategic changes towards to more preventive approach to food safety management started as early as the 1920s (Mossel et al,1995),although this strategies were largely unsuccessful. Although there was a renewed emphasis on preventative food safety in 1930s, it is only since the 1970s.That this approach has been ad opted leading to the use HACCP (Bauman,1994). The hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) was originally developed by the Pillsbury Company, working with NASA and the US Army Laboratories at Natick, to assure that food supplied to the manned shoes programme was microbiologically safe (Food Safety Through the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point System, 1973 Bauman, 1974). Over the years it has been adopted by Codex, EU and other national and international regulatory bodies as the foundation of microbiological food safety management, allowing food manufacturers, retailers, distributors and caterers the ability to identify hazards and determine critical control points and effective control measures ( Mike, 2004). In 1998, ILSI Europe published its report on food safety management tools, which sought to describe how the tools available at the time interacted with each other. This included the use of hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) (Mike, 2004). There i s evidence that business adopting a food safety management approach based on HACCP and pre-requisite programs (PRPs) produce part microbiological quality food (Little et al,2002Little et al,2003).Many food companies have been developing their own HACCP plans for about a decade, following the seven HACCP principles and applying them to their circumstances in order to produce save foods. However, HACCP plans have to be so specific to the type of business and the physical layout of each site that it is not possible to have one set of HACCP standards for all companies to follow in all situations. And while HACCP plan requirements have been codified in many localities, HACCP regulations are not and in all likelihood cannot be-made uniform. So that need to apply management system beside HACCP which make company combine between policy definition and quality manual, with definition of responsibilities for management and employees, prerequisite programs and HACCP plan implementation, and measures for implementing the food safety program. Preparing the HACCP team and effective recording systems, and a combination of self assessment with application of inseparable auditing, management review, application of all legal requirements and supplier evaluation, are other concerns in this system (Mehrdad, 2007).For implementing any standardized management system, a company needs to identify and redesign its processes so as to incorporate the specifications of the individual standard. Processes interactions also need to be determined. In most cases, additional processes related with various internal operations (such as targets setting, internal audits etc.), often not previously identified and standardized, will need to be designed. As a final step, written standard run procedures (SOPs) need to be developed, effectively describing all activities for implementing the processes (as designed) together with the respective managerial responsibilities. For the ISO 22000 standar d, a safety plan according to given specifications is also required, as described in the coterminous section. When developed, the safety plan needs to be integrated within respective SOPs for actual use.It can be stated that ISO 22000 implementation provides a food safety system designed, operated and continuously updated (improved) as an integral part of overall organization n management. Note that classical HACCP, practically designed to operate as an effective stand-alone system, may lead to wasteful implementations, with food safety not integrated within but operating in parallel with other management systems such as ISO 9000.This is probably one of the reason why many related studies, in order to ensure appropriate action, include all sort of measures that may straight off (or indirectly) impact food safety in the HACCP plan.(Panagiotis, 2009)Last, it is worth stressing the ISO 22000 requirement for denary objectives and targets. By establishing a system driven by objective s, ISO 22000 provides a solid basis for improvement and the determination of acceptable hazards levels (i.e. remaining risk). It is worth noting that, through the Food Safety Objectives (FSO) concept, public health goals may be consistently translated into quantitative operational targets for food safety management (for discussions of FSO see Stringer, 2005 Gorris , 2005). uncorrupted HACCP effectively specifies two safety control levels (i.e. PrerequisitePrograms (PRPs) and the HACCP plan). The differentiation between these two levels, however, is rather weak and not generally understood. As a result, most early implementation studies included both levels in the HACCP plan (see Untermann, 1999), practice which decreases system efficiency and increases safety costs (see economic analysis in Roberto et al. (2006)). The ISO 22000 standard natterd an additional control level, thus created a three-level safety control hierarchy, namely(1) PRPs.(2) operational Prerequisite Programs (O- PRPs).(3) HACCP plan.In the following, we briefly present each of these control levels, providing specific interpretations when necessary (to cover issues where the standard specifications are unclear or inconsistent).The PRPs define all basic conditions and activities that are necessary to maintain a hygienic environment throughout the food chain (Sub clause 3.8), by enforcing the implementation of the appropriate Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Good Hygienic Practices (GHP) specifications throughout the organization. Therefore, we can generally interpret PRPs as the control measures covering the design and the basic operations of all infrastructures deployed (hardware and operating practices) and which impose specifications for the development of the system SOPs (see previous section). Typical PRPs examples include alter and sanitation of production equipment, maintenance, personnel selection and training, etc.Thus, PRPs cover management activities necessary for any food organization and have a weak association with the specific food product produced. Note, however, that PRPs may control dangerous hazards and fully complement safety control at operational level. Operational safety control, which directly relates to the product and production process used, is accomplished by the other two control levels, namely(1) O-PRPs and(2) the HACCP plan.ISO 22000 does not give a direct definition of the HACCP plan and defines O-PRPs as follows O-PRPs are those PRPs identified by the hazard analysis as essential in order to control the likelihood of introducing food safety hazards (Sub clause 3.9). By this definition, O-PRPs are directly related to PRPs. However, this is not consistent with the way they are subsequently enured by the standard, since both the O-PRPs and the HACCP plan are specified as the outcome of the hazard analysis that defines the measures to control the hazards essential to food safety (Sub clause 7.4.4) other that those covered by the PR Ps. Adopting this view (which is fully supported by ISO/TS 22004, Sub clause 7.4.4) for the relation between the HACCP plan and O-PRPs, we still need to separate the measures entering each plan. The ISO 22000 standard specifies a set of sise criteria for this separation. However, little application guidance is offered either in this standard or in ISO/TS 22004. To deal with this issue, we adopted an implementation approach where the principal criteria for hazard control categorization are the hazard level (in terms of hazard severity and frequency of occurrence) and the feasibility of monitoring this hazard in a timely manner and enable immediate corrective actions.Thus, hazards with more toilsome impact to consumer health, higher risk of occurrence and higher ability to be timely monitored are confronted by the HACCP plan. The remaining hazards are controlled by establishing appropriate O-PRPs this categorization clearly depends on the actual design of the production system.Assum e, for example, a production flow design where some hazard cannot possibly be timely controlled and should, thus, be controlled by an O-PRP. However, if this hazard impact on public health is severe, it needs to be part of the HACCP plan. Therefore, redesign of the production processes is required (e.g. a production delay may be introduced that will act as a product quarantine) in order to enable direct control of the hazard, through the HACCP plan. A final issue concerns the specific control measures incorporated in the O-PRPs and the HACCP plan. Given any process, a control measure is entirely defined by all the elements that describe the respective control loop scope, critical parameters monitored, critical limits and corrective actions. ISO 22000 clearly stresses the need for the face of such a typical control mechanism both for the O-PRPs (Sub clause 7.5) and the HACCP plan (Sub clause 7.6.1). Note that specifications for particular control measures types are not given in the standard, since they are dependent on the particularities of the processes under control (Panagiotis, 2009).3.6 ISO 22000 AdvantagesBenefits of implementing a systematic and effective food safety management system (FSMS) include the following advantages unrivalled common system throughout supply chain. Better communication throughout supply chain. Integrates quality management and food safety management. Control /reduce food safety hazard. Legal compliance. rear recognition throughout the food supply chain as a single standard approach to food safety Can be applied independently Integrates the principles of HACCP and application steps of CODEX. Allow small and /or less developed organization to implement an externally developed system. One audit can achieve certification to cover both the food safety management system and quality management system. (Vel, et al.,2005).As mentioned in (Food Standards Agency Report, 2007) Your FSMS will also give you the ability to achieve the follow ing benefits1. Operating a FSMS increases business effectiveness.2. Operating a FSMS can increase business profitability.3. A FSMS is appropriate for all businesses working with food.4. The extra time spent carrying out a FSMS is time well spent.Through the use of your FSMS, you can remain confident that your processes are compliant and that each step in the process is closely monitored to ensure that critical limits are unploughed under control. Your FSMS will also give you the ability to streamline processes, reduce inefficiencies due to paper-based forms, as well as provide greater profile into your system Most notably, using quantitative risk assessment tools, you can identify hazards more effectively, make the process more efficient, and mitigate any unforeseen risks down the food chain.We can add that ISO 22002005 represents the latest step in the evolution of food safety systems beyond HACCP. It combines the five explorative steps documentation requirements, management res ponsibility, resources management, planning and realization of safe product and validation, verification and improvement of FSMS and seven principles of HACCP perform hazards assessment, identify critical control points, establish critical limits, establish monitoring procedures, detail corrective actions, effective r