Priestleys Paradox Communication

Priestleys conundrum CommunicationCommunication is an essential part of e rattlingday life. in that respect argon some things which take a leak effect on converse, technology having a very large effect. Through the increase of chat technology, there has been a moderate in the whole step of effective parley. While considering the theory of Priestleys enigma, the wish of social communication in parvenue forms of technology have signifi stacktly affected the bore of communication. Modern technologies decrease the quality of communications with the lack of vocal and non- literal feedback, the aberrancy of sums and also the anisometric access to forms of these technologies. Verbal and non-verbal elements of interpersonal communication have efficaciously declined out-of-pocket to technology.The close stired commonwealth of communication in society today is interpersonal communication. Interpersonal communication is referenced as communication between two or to a gr eater extent flock which try to create and understand meaning (Turner West 2009 8). end-to-end interpersonal communication there can be noise. Noise is anything which can distort or prevent communication (Eunson 2008 18). Interpersonal communication has many elements which contribute to quality communication.Interpersonal communication requires verbal and non-verbal feedback, which is not granted effectively through modern font technologies. The quality of effective communication is cursorily decreased with the increase of technology. This type of communication (interpersonal communication) has two main elements, verbal and non-verbal skills. Verbal communication is the use of vocabularys, words, sounds and letters and uses great emphasis on tone and pitch. Modern technology therefore decreases the quality of communication because verbal communication is not always possible. Non-verbal communication is communication through merely visual forms. Non-verbal consists of gestures , facial expressions, eye contact and numerous other signals of the benignant body (Eunson 2008 260). This non-verbal element of communication however cannot be seen through most technologies so distorts the mess eld to the receiver. Both verbal and non-verbal communication skills assist, distort and chock up communication between individuals (Eunson 2008 286). The theory of Priestleys Paradox is most relevant when considering the quality of communication through technologies is declining. Email is an example of modern technology which has an impact of the quality of communication. Through email, the receiver cannot communicate using verbal and non-verbal communication. This distortion is happening with all types of technology and is having affect on the interactions of individuals and creating problems. Without face-to-face verbal and non-verbal interactions the sender is unable to make assumptions on the receivers perceptions of the messages. Some particular juvenile technologi es have the ability for messages to be distorted excessively due to the language used.Technology has decreased quality of communication because it can cause mistake through abbreviations that distort messages. This particularly effects our societys younger generation. Generation Y in particularly are media interactionists, not knowing a initiation without media and technology (Kundanis 2003 43). An example of technology which is most commonly the source of abbreviation is SMS (short messaging service). Evidently, abbreviations are a weak substitute for body language, literal and tonal expression. These are replaced by using uppercase lettering and kinky symbols (emoticons) which leads to misinterpretation while decoding the message as there is no shared meaning of the context (Danet 2001 17). The slope language is often comprised to get shortened abbreviations and phrases. This language has since blended into the everyday modern society causation the younger generations to be less likely using proper English language. While communicating through technology, the sender and receiver need to have a clear understanding of one anothers abbreviations and context or else the message will be distorted. This may then lead to a partition in communication if the receiver is unable to decode the message precondition (Eunson 2008 14). This is also discernible as there is a digital fraction between people with the unequal access to technology.The decrease in quality of communication is due to technology not being equally reachable for our whole society. Priestleys Paradox theory expresses the point that people coming from busted -economical societies have a greater quality of communication rather than people coming from a higher-economical society because it is filled with modern communication technologies(Eunson 2008 5). There is a digital divide between people due to new forms of technology. This causes distortion in communication because of the misunderstand ing of messages that are received through modern technology. It is now expected of a person to have friendship of modern technologies which may not be universally accepted due to the unequal access of technology (Turner West 2009 105). Modern technology-driven communication is forever revolving, developing and expanding (Eunson 2008 4). They are expensive and therefore low income earners would not be able update technologies frequently. The digital divide is not only found on this however, there are many other issues. The accessibility of modern technology is affected by geographical location, income status, culture, education and also age (Mossberger, Tolbert Stansbury 2003 15-23). This causes the decrease in effective communication and interpersonal communication as everyone does not have the same available technology.New technologies have importantly decreased the quality of effective communication. Ultimately interpersonal communication elements such(prenominal) as verbal a nd non-verbal skills are not able to be effectively used through modern technologies. This can distort messages in communication just like abbreviations can. Both people participating in the communication need to have similar understanding of the context and language or else the quality of communication will be diminished. The digital divide because of the unequal access of modern technology also has an impact of the quality of communication. Priestleys Paradox theory suggests that the quality of communication is minimised because of new technologies. This theory is most evident in modern communication therefore modern technology has decreased the quality of communication.Words 1021